Not the easiest of days


I spent yesterday with the 100 or so other bishops of the Church of England and with the 8 women who are the regional representatives to the House of Bishops, discussing the content of the Report of the House of Bishops Working Group on Human Sexuality, known as the Pilling Report, after Sir Joseph Pilling who chaired the working group. It was a challenging day as we sought to share perspectives on the Report. It is clear that discernment in the midst of such potentially divisive issues is necessarily a lengthy process. 

The Church holds many dimensions of the matter of human sexuality in balance, even perhaps in tension. This is not an easy position for the Church to be in. Neither is such a complex set of  theological, missiological and pastoral challenges something which the world's media easily understands. For me, these are some of the questions we face, and about which I hope the people of God in this diocese might have opportunity for some honest, respectful and theologically informed discussion: 

Theological questions: What is the joyful and good news of the Gospel that the Church can proclaim with regard to human sexuality? How can the Church's traditional teaching, based on Scripture, and informed by Tradition and Reason, help the Church promote human flourishing? How do we listen to what the Spirit might be saying to the Church today, and discern the mind of Christ on these matters?

Missiological questions: How can the Church commend its teaching in the light of the profound shift in popular opinion in England, Europe and the West on matters related to human sexuality, not least among younger generations who find the Church's teaching to be a stumbling block? While the Church's mission does not mean a wholesale conforming to culture, does the truth of the Gospel need to be refreshed by new insights?

Pastoral: Within the framework of the traditional teaching of the Church, what pastoral approaches can be taken to welcome and affirm the presence within the Church of gay and lesbian people, lay and ordained?What approaches can the Church have which are loving and positive, while also provisional and not necessarily implying some ultimate change in doctrine?

Below the fold is the statement which we released today about our discussions. 
________________________________________________________________________________
 
The College of Bishops met on 27th January, 2014 to begin a process of reflection on the issues raised by the Pilling Report (GS 1929). The College expressed appreciation to Sir Joseph Pilling and to all members of the working party for the work they have done on behalf of the Church.

We are united in welcoming and affirming the presence and ministry within the Church of gay and lesbian people, both lay and ordained. We are united in acknowledging the need for the Church to repent for the homophobic attitudes it has sometimes failed to rebuke and affirming the need to stand firmly against homophobia wherever and whenever it is to be found.

We are united in seeking to be faithful to the Scriptures and the tradition of the Church and in seeking to make a loving, compassionate and respectful response to gay men and women within Church and society.

We recognise the very significant change in social attitudes to sexuality in the United Kingdom in recent years.

We recognise also the strongly held and divergent views reflected in the Pilling Report, across the Anglican Communion and in the Church of England. We acknowledge that these differences are reflected also within the College of Bishops and society as a whole.

We accept the recommendation of the Pilling Report that the subject of sexuality, with its history of deeply entrenched views, would best be addressed by facilitated conversations, ecumenically, across the Anglican Communion and at national and diocesan level and that this should continue to involve profound reflection on the interpretation and application of Scripture. These conversations should set the discussion of sexuality within the wider context of human flourishing.

We have together asked the Archbishops to commission a small group to design a process for these conversations and additional materials to support and enable them. We hope that the outline for the process and the additional materials will be approved by the House of Bishops in May.

We acknowledge that one of the challenges we face is to create safe space for all those involved to be honest about their own views and feelings. This has not always happened and it must do so in the future. We recognise that we will not all agree and that this process is in part committed to seeking good disagreement that testifies to our love for one another across the church in obedience to Christ

As the Archbishops noted in November, the Pilling report is not a new policy statement from the Church of England and we are clear that the Church of England's pastoral and liturgical practice remains unchanged during this process of facilitated conversation.

No change to the Church of England's teaching on marriage is proposed or envisaged. The House of Bishops will be meeting next month to consider its approach when same sex marriage becomes lawful in England in March.

We are grateful to the whole Church for their prayers for our meeting today and for the guidance of the Holy Spirit. We recognise that on many occasions in the past the Church has faced challenging questions. It is vital in these moments to take counsel together, to read and reflect upon the Scriptures and to continue to discern together the mind of Christ.

Sir Joseph Pilling

Comments

  1. Thank you +David, for this well-balanced and wise reflective response. Looking at the issues of human sexuality by focussing on the theological, missiological questions, and from various pastoral angles is vitally important. To strike a balance between the Church's mission by not going for a wholesale conforming to culture, whilst safeguarding the truth of the Gospel, needs indeed to be refreshed by new insights. This is also what we must be able to communicate to the media, especially to the red-tops and sensationalists (such as the likes of Ruth Rendell).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Farewell to the Diocese in Europe

Canon Frances Hiller

Archbishop of Canterbury's Pentecost Letter: A European Consequence